recently, I watched a video about a debute between science and religion, which is named as science refute religion. four great thinkers debute about whether there is still a room for God, whether we should still hold the religion view.
particles physics are definitely the kind of people should standing out on this kind of topic.
I always think that physics are the greatest people in the society, they always bear the responsibility to explore the world on behalf of all the human kinds. Along the history, physics help us understand how the earth works, so we don’t need to worship god of wind or god of sun. Physics are becoming the new philosophers in the nowadays world, helping us smooth fear.
Physics represent the wisdom of the society, as physics they have responsibility to address the problem, so obviously, as the greatest physics in 20th century, albert einstein has done that.
I read the article he published in new york times, here is some quotes
The man who is thoroughly convinced of the universal operation of the law of causation cannot for a moment entertain the idea of a being who interferes in the course of events – provided, of course, that he takes the hypothesis of causality really seriously.
this words express his doubt of a God, which is some force interfering the causality of all the events
He has no use for the religion of fear and equally little for social or moral religion. A God who rewards and punishes is inconceivable to him for the simple reason that a man’s actions are determined by necessity, external and internal, so that in God’s eyes he cannot be responsible, any more than an inanimate object is responsible for the motions it undergoes. Science has therefore been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man’s ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hopes of reward after death.
as scientists, we have fundamental belief about causality, and the reason and consequence is not about God.
A contemporary has said, not unjustly, that in this materialistic age of ours the serious scientific workers are the only profoundly religious people.
obviously, scientist workers are working on some stuff so remote away from any reality. their motivation is what can be called religion
Also as others say, science and knowledge would replace our fear of unknown events, and psychology should replace the morality posed by the religion.
science can help us understand what is , but never can help us understand what should be , or the meaning the reason