太平轮

这几年,中国电影市场全面爆发,但随之而来的是大热影片的质量遭到强烈质疑,实是在撑不起这个票房。从郭敬明的小时代开始,中国以前的电影观念受到强烈的冲击。以前拍电影是一小部分精英的事情,剧本也是得反复推敲。现在,似乎任何想拍的人都可以拍,找几个明星请宣传一下就可以拿上来上映,引起了很多人的不满。

我觉得问题不在于这批烂片,而是我们对于电影的固有的传统思维有点太单一化了。

电影院,说白了就是一块大屏幕+一个公共空间,让大家一起看,为什么非要放一个故事?不可以放综艺片?不可以放搞笑的网剧? 我倒觉得小时代之类的放MV,爸爸去哪儿之类的放综艺,还有放网剧,都是一种开创性的思维,能赚到钱也说明了市场对其的肯定。如果真的只有质量过关的大片,好的艺术片才能称得上电影,才能在电影院上映,那一年能上映的片子还能剩下几部?中国的票房根本不会这么火。

我觉得大部分人的思维想反了,是认为先有中国电影的火,才有这么多烂片来圈钱。而事实应该是,因为有了这么多有宣传点的,开心搞笑的片子,才吸引来了这么多的观众,才让中国的票房大爆发。这样的市场,才会吸引更多的人来做电影,才会让中国加快电影工业化。

至于中国电影,也许不用承担我们强调的文化输出的功能, 不用想着拿Oscar, 传播中国文化。我们本身的市场就很大,也许可以像印度的Bollywood一样,多做符合大众口味的电影,让中国普通 人约会假日,多一个消费的方式,不是挺好的嘛?

烂片会不会抢了好的电影的市场呢?

这是普遍的很多人批评这类影片的原因,烂片这么多且这么好赚钱,就没有人用心的做好电影了。

本身这个观点有点牵强,什么是好的电影,很难定义。其实电影又不是哲学,还必须发人深省,能让人选离自己的生活,有两个小时的vacation就很不错了。别说电影了,中国的文学也担不了此任,让电影去拍深沉的东西,不是很可笑的一件事情嘛?好的文艺片,在哪个国家的欣赏的人都不是主流,这些人不是烂片的观众,自然也不会受到冲击。而且越成熟的电影工作,会产生更多技术上更成熟的作品,更流顺易于欣赏,不是挺好的嘛?

在国外能看到中国电影实在有限,我本身又不爱太评论好坏,但看到太平轮后还是忍不住得吐槽几句:

 

能把这么好的剧本,从这种角度拍,也真的是太应该失败了,也难怪请了这么多电影明星还是撑不起票房。可见,大众还是很理智,如果只是搞笑的电影,拍得没有什么品味也无所谓。太平轮,是这么好的一个题材,所处的时代背景又是那么激荡,从何种角度都不应该拍出这么烂的电影。这真是对那代人,对死于船上的人的不敬。

是吴宇森真的不懂这段历史的厚重,还是迫于审查,不能不拍得这么白痴?

吴宇森似乎太想把所有的都放进2个多小时的电影中,从国民党军官,台湾本地人到大陆的普通老姓,结果就是都讲不好。比如国民党的军官,从打日本人到内战,很多的心路历程可以写,不得不几场战火戏就匆匆过了。当然,估计也是为了过审,不能不这么简单。

比如金城武的台湾本地人,也有很多的篇幅可以写,台湾本地人对大陆的感情,对中国的认同,对日本的感情(他们那时确切应该是日本人),相当微妙,但政治不正确,也不能写。

但最着重拍的,章子怡,却是太假了。浮生乱世,怎么可能是为了爱情天南地北,不惜自贱的去找一个仅睡了几次的男人?这完全不符合那个时代人的心理。当时的确是有很多平民不惜一切的要上太平轮,去台湾,他们真实的目的,貌似也不能真实的拍,要不然也绝过不了审。

既然知道 要在中国大陆上映,所有的人物真实的心理都不能拍,你只能要不选择,不在大陆上映,找海外投资,以吴宇森的实力应该也可以。要不选择,干脆只拍为什么会沉船,淡写历史背景,突出一场灾难,也行。

因为太平轮沉船,就这件事而言,也很有戏剧性。对于船 过载描述太轻,沉船的经过也拍得不够细,使得这部片本子根本不够完整。

一部片子,要讲完这么大的一个历史,这么多人物,而且真实的很多都不能触碰,使得这类电影最后这么失败。

什么时候我们能公开的,客观的看这一段历史呢?我想在中国,短时间内应该都不可能。

也好,至少太平轮,又勾起了很多人对于那整个时代的思考。

 

 

 

 

Everest — why do we climb mountains

I am organizing all the movies I have watched during 2015. Among all these, Everest is one of the only two I actually went to a real theater, sat there and watched with a large crowd. It is not an easy task for me to simply get out of the door and join others, however, I desperately wanted to do that.

I wish to support this movie since I highly respect all the mountain climbers and climbing Everest is also one of my dreams.everest-action-poster

The movie is based on a well known climbing disaster in Mount Everest 1996, causing 12 causality during that season. Even though it is a fictional , this movie gives a quite a faithful portrait.Though the truth of this disaster can still be a myth, a lot of  scenes in the movie is actually corresponding  to the other documentary and books. There are several documentaries investigating this disaster.

 

As with all other disasters, besides all the sorrows they bring, they teach the rest of us important lessons, especially  for the later commercial climbing industry.  Stick strictly to the turn around time,  never climb with the clients, more accurate weather forecasting,  cooperation between all the climb teams, etc. Sadly, the only way for us human beings to get these vital lessons is through all the failures and distastes.

Still, one question remaining for people who have never climbed, why.

article-2512812-001a3a8200000258-882_306x423

Jeorge Mallory

Why did you want to climb Mount Everest?

Because it is there  —- George Mallory 

The legendary climber George Mallory gave the most beautiful answer to this question, showing human beings’ innate impulse to challenge the limit.

For me, the answer is much down to the earth, or boring in some sense.

Climbing is much easier than the daily life.  Life is the hardest thing in my opinion , compared with it, other things become much easier. When climbing, we just need to focus on one clear goal, getting to the top safely. Everything else vanishes in your mind. You are so clear and focused. However, in daily life, we are faced with confusing goal in life  and tons of mixed message.  What is the goal of life ? What is the path to happiness? What should I do at this moment?

Unfortunately, I can never figure out life and it always remains in confusion.

Extreme conditions expose all your weakness.  You will never know which is your weak link if you never put yourself in a challenging situation. The motto — get out of your comfortable zoom, begin to catch up in recent years. However,  I see lots of people may take it wrong. It is not about simply trying new stuff, it is about in a position to challenge yourself. Sometimes, the failure even would lead to death. Mountain climbing is a deadly sport, zero tolerance for any mistake. To successfully summit, strength is only one part of it. You need great estimation of yourself, need to conquer the summit fever, need to control in extreme situation. Some minor imperfection in your character will be hugely exaggerated in that situation for your notice.

Bear with that, any journey of life is ultimately a process to learn and develop of yourself.

Everest: Beyond the Limit  is a reality show documenting normal people trying to conquer the Everest. As a audience, we can clearly see how people’s character eventually affect their final conquest.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everest:_Beyond_the_Limit

everest1

 

Does it worth to risk one’s life for adventures?

This question is highly subjective, since it is totally dependent on one’s understanding of life. For some people, like followers of Epicureanism the main purpose of life is individual pleasure, sure, climbing mountain would be a stupid idea.

For some,  agree with Socrates, life is about striving for your potential. Thus, similar to a lot of mountaineers,  constantly challenging to find out the limits of human beings, even until the death, is non disputable.

For modern generation, most of people believe in life is about getting as much pleasure and experience as they can get.  Watching the movie might be a reminder of a spirit and aspiration, long existed in human history, but gradually faded with time goes by.

Book : Zero to One

Actually, I finished the book long time ago, but the recent conversation with one friend, bringing back all the memories of the insights from this great book.

This book is often treated as a simple guide book for startups, since the author is famous for  co founding Paypal and also is a successful venture capitalist. However, it shouldn’t be confined to just a business book, this book touches a much deep topic– the merits of innovation and how to truly get success in every sphere of life ( of course that is simply my take on this).

Run away from IT and the Big data as fast as you can!

In Silicon Valley, this claim would be laughed at so hard since everything seems tagged with software and big data. However, if we scrutinize the SV,  it’s clear that the environment is much tough for the next big IT company, like Facebook or Google to come. IT is mainly a tool for providing information. Now, there is no IT service an average customer needs which has not been provided. Actually we are supplying much more than people need. Artificial Intelligence is still a myth by now. Big data is definitely not the solution for true intelligence, but breakthrough from neural science has not yet arrived. In some sense, IT industry is in a huge stagnation.

As a consequence, the competition remains so fierce that few companies really can make a profit, if not the hyped bubble.

But SV still is the most vibrant place in the world, the next great things would be not in the IT but somewhere else, like biology, space, energy etc.

Innovation is hard, but the reward is huge

Compared with globalization, innovation, which means from zero to one, is hard. Great things needs time, talents, huge resources to make it happen. However, the reward is huge since you are the monopoly in the field.

So it also applies to other field. Building  your unique core competence is  much better chasing the trends and  following what others are doing.

————————————————————-

创业在中国

想起这本书是因为最近见到了一个大学的朋友,跟所有的中国年轻人一样,我们又回到了一个老话题– 回国创业?

创业在中国有多火,就不必我再提了。这几年,我还没有见过任何一个人没有过想创业想法。

但是这真的是一个好想法嘛?

如果时间倒退回十年前,情况就是像书中提出的globalization理论一样,是一种横向的发展,把技术横向推广到全世界,就能赚很多的钱。这就是中国最著名的 C to C 模式(copy to China), 的确是获得了很大的成功。

但这几年,能copy 的机会都copy 完了, 中国的互联网也成了世界上最发达的地区之一了,剩下的就只有zero to one 的创新模式。

创新,以我的浅见,有一种技术门槛低,是发掘用户未被满足的需求。这种创新要对市场有很精准的认识。可惜我们都太年轻,很多又是生活在另一个宇届的宅男宅女,对于普通人到底需要什么是不可能有理解的。这种创业自然是前几个进去属于大赢家,所以要抓住时机,看到有把握的机会,不能有半点迟疑。

另一种是技术创新,难度之大,不是读了几个Ph.D 就能做成的。况且在中国,大量的前期投资技术创新的VC还是少之又少。 与其在很年轻的时候就回国创业,不如在自己的行业多工作几年,有真的很好的想法,再行动也不迟。

我见到的大部分人,是因为喜欢创业的氛围。心灵鸡汤似的,年轻就要追求梦想之类的。固然,创业比守着朝九晚五的工作要有意思多了,顺便也能泡几个大学女生。

如果把创业仅仅当之为人生游玩的一部分,自然也没什么问题,只是不要放过高的期望就好。总是有人把创业失败率低,当成自己不成功的借口。也许,千军万马创业,只有少数人成功,这并不是买彩票一样的随机事件,而是因为这些人,根本不清楚自己在想要什么,刚开始就注定是失败的呢?

竞争

中国有前几年,一直鼓吹竞争,似乎市场经济 == 竞争,然后完全的竞争会降低成本为消费者获利。 以此为由,知识产权在中国一直很难被保护。但竞争,其实是很不好的一种形式,过度的竞争只能是每个人都是loser.

商家不是消费者的敌人,不能用竞争把商家的利润无限趋于0,那长期的investment,是不可能发生的。有一次听一个中国企业家讲座,就提到他做企业时把很多的时间用来分析竞争对手的strategy, 消耗了自己大量本应用于产品研发的精力。竞争,产生于跟风的门槛低,一个business被证明是成功了,市场需求被证实了,就有大量的人跟进,不可避免,尤其是技术门槛很低的时候。而提高技术,品牌影响力,又不是一件特别容易的事情。

Anyway,   人生不在于一时,大量的青春电影和创业,让我们过度的崇拜年轻人,过度的崇拜激情,而那不是人生最成熟的时候,也不是最了解自己的时候。有时,等一等,可能是更好的选择。机会,总是会有的。

 

 

 

 

Escape from Freedom

Freedom has a twofold meaning for modern man: that he has been freed from traditional authorities and has become an ‘individual,’ but that at the same time he has become isolated, powerless and an instrument of purposes outside of himself, alienated from himself and others; furthermore, that this state undermines his self, weakens and frightens him, and makes him ready for submission to new kinds of bondage.

-Eric  Fromm

escape_from_freedom

 

Freedom, is often  regarded as a human’s innate desire. Human history is fused with bloody battles to gain freedom from external powers bonded us, like authorities, traditions, culture or environmental constrains.

advanced-french-vocabulary1

However, this book investigated an interesting question :

 Can freedom become a burden, too heavy for man to bear, something he tries to escape from?

Throughout history, we can also find out lots of evidence to prove people’s volunteer escape from freedom. Religion extremes, ultra-nationalism,  even Nazi are all great examples to show people giving up their individuality simply to be in part of a huge institution.

Why? 

The author argues, which I totally agree , this is due to human’s fear of isolation and powerlessness. True independence is hard to obtain. Even though the modern technology and capitalism  renders people  a lot of power to be economically independent, it can’t give people a sense of security , which lots of people desperately needed. The sense of security and belonging is usually found in connection with others, like being part of large group.  If one can’t find it, the results would be lost, confusion and anxiety.

It seems that nothing is more difficult for the average man to bear than the feeling of not being identified with a larger group.So whenever another authority comes, new social orders, new values, even new dictatorship, he is ready to surrender. Even in democratic society,  people seems to be free,  in stead the reality is that they simply automatically register to the values imposed on them and never think about it. They believe  it’s their own thinking, but maybe not true.

For many, the individuality they claim is an illusion.  They adopt entirely the kind of personality offered to them by cultural patterns; and they therefore become exactly as all others are and as expected to be.

The solution?

The author suggest the positive  form of freedom based on original thinking and spontaneity. Judge everything based on your own thinking and feelings, retain the curiosity and cheerfulness as a child.

Two things would help escape from the fear, work and love. But still, how to achieve that has to be found out by oneself.

The journey would be long and winding, however, remaining the status of relying on others for security is not sustainable. Also, the temporary calm and security comes with a high price — lose oneself.

If possible, give yourself a chance to grow your own total personality.