Is Life Hard

Life is hard. You already knew that, I’m guessing. But life is not impossible. And life is wonderful—ultimately. But, still, it is hard—and evolutionary psychology can help us understand why.

Evolutionary psychology (see Geher, 2014) is an approach to understandinghuman psychological processes and behavior that sees humans as importantly part of the natural world—and sees our psychological systems as shaped by evolutionary forces across deep time. For the lion’s share of evolutionary history, humans lived in nomadic groups (of approximately 150 individuals—including both kin and non-kin). Exercise was essential every day. Famine was common. Premature mortality was common. Disease and death from predation were parts of everyday life. Life has always been hard for our kind. Always.

And no matter how cushy your life may be in some ways today, life is still hard for our kind. Below are five reasons that you may find daily life challenging—as understood by evolutionary psychology:

5. You’ve got a selfish streak in you.

From the evolutionary perspective, organisms that passed the test of natural selection are those that had ancestors with qualities that facilitated their own survival and reproduction. To a large extent, all organisms evolved with a suite of physical and behavioral qualities that primarily benefit themselves. This is why you are motivated to eat when you are hungry—this basic drive benefits you and helps you survive. Hunger is a basic adaptation that works similarly in all of us. Our psychology includes a host of processes and drives such as hunger that primarily benefit ourselves.

Our ancestors who took care of themselves were more likely than others to becomeancestors. To some extent, all basic survival adaptations can be seen as the biological foundations of a selfish approach to life. And if you’re reading this, then you, like me and like everyone else, have a host of such evolved features that serve to primarily benefit you. This is a good thing because this is how organisms come to exist. But it comes with a cost—we’ve all got a splash of selfishness built into all aspects of our evolved psychology. So you’ve got a good bit of selfishness in you—like it or not—and this fact is true about everyone you know as well.

And this fact makes life hard.

4. We are all hypocrites.

No one likes to be called a hypocrite. It’s an insult—in all contexts. It’s like being told, “You stink! You did X but you said Y and we all saw it. Ha-ha—we got you!” But as Kurzban (2011) famously pointed out, we’ve all got the tendency in us to be hypocritical. It’s not like there are the bad people in the world—the hypocrites—and then the good ones, who are never at all hypocritical. That’s not at all how things work.

Hypocrisy is a complex phenomenon often characterized by a person experiencing X in one brain system and Y in another brain system. Once you’ve reached a certain point in life, you’ve got plenty of things in your brain that are inconsistent with other things in there—that’s just how it is!

And this fact makes life hard.

3. Free will is sort of wishful thinking—there are enormously powerful factors beyond it that affect all human behavior.

We love to believe in free will—and I’d say it’s important to do so in our daily lives. We need a concept of free will to hold others and ourselves accountable. But scientific psychology is all about the documentation of factors that govern behavior—beyond simply free will. The evolutionary psychological perspective suggests dozens of causes of everyday behaviors that are beyond just free will. For instance, if a supervisor at work hires his nephew instead of another more qualified candidate, he partly chose that outcome—but he also may unconsciously be demonstrating kin-selected altruism, or the tendency to over-benefit kin in decisions. He may have convinced himself that his nephew really was the best—in spite of other evidence. This kind of thing happens all the time. In Little League, coaches’ kids often get great field positions and nice places in the batting order. And few coaches would admit that they are engaging in unconsciously determined and evolutionarily-shaped nepotism. You control your behavior—but only to a point—and there are lots of evolved forces at work that control your behavior along with whatever free will you’ve got.

And this makes life hard.

2. We are all emotional.

Emotions have their upsides and their downsides. Some days, wouldn’t it be great to just be Mr. Spock? But you’re probably not a Vulcan. You’ve got a human emotion system—like it or not. Since Darwin’s (1872) famous treatise on the evolutionary nature of emotions across species (including our own), scholars have been able to conceptualize human emotions as: (a) deeply rooted in our evolved past (with roots that precede the evolution of primates), and (b) as having important adaptive functions. Consider anxiety: I’m guessing that you don’t love feeling anxious. But anxiety exists in our species because it is so darn adaptive. Anxiety motivates people to get themselves out of dangerous situations. For example, if you’re hiking and you almost slip and almost fall off a cliff, you might feel anxious. And that anxiety will keep you away from the edge of the cliff moving forward. Negative emotions are deeply rooted in our evolutionary past—like it or not.

And, yes, they make life hard.

1. It’s not always easy to get along.

Wouldn’t it be peachy if everyone always got along in all groups? That would be great. But did you ever notice that this is not how things go? There are tons of reasons based on human evolution that account for this fact: In each group, each individual has his or her own interests at stake—and these only align partly with the interests of the broader group or the interests of others within the group. This goes back to people all having a splash of selfishness embedded in them. Further, like many species, humans tend to have dominance hierarchies emerge in many group contexts. So just like in a pack of dogs, people in a group will work to reach the top of the totem pole—often stepping on the backs of others to get there—and often trying to bring down those above them. Is this good or bad? Often, it’s simply our evolved nature.

And this too makes life hard.

Woody Allen 和文艺青年们

人年轻的时候都想装成熟,装有见识,装有文化,简单说就是装逼, 我大学的时候就那样。那时候心里清楚自己没文化,总觉得不好意思故想装成有点文化。于是,学很多文艺青年,第一次看了Woody Allen的电影。看完以后他有名的几部以后,完全不明白为什么这些为什么是好电影,除了对他那部Everything you wanted to know about sex印象深刻以外, 其它的都根本没印象,近一个半小时就是不停的对话。

年纪大了再去看Woody Allen的电影,反而被里面很多的对话吸引。Woody Allen的电影男主角(大部分都是他自己表演的),都是跟人聊起来显得很有文化,懂文学懂电影懂艺术,各种quotes,各种名人,但生活却不并成功的男人, 想要女人又追不太到,事业又不起气。第二次看的时候,觉得他的电影是反讽这些现实生活中的loser,只能靠一些虚伪的“知识”来找找自信,并不如里面的女人来得可爱。

最近几年再看他的电影,倒反而很喜欢他,虽也杂着一些同情,但总体来说,如果身边有人像他电影里演的那样,我肯定会跑去跟人交个朋友的。

Woody Allen的电影讲述的是现代中产阶级的虚伪与焦虑, 幻想与现实。 作为一个中产阶级,最危险的是什么?

最危险的就是有自我意识(self consciousness). 如果没有很强的自我意识,不是特别敏感,不是特别感性,对情与爱没有过多的要求,生活就会很容易。本质上,中产阶级就是这个社会的机器,提供非常routine的工作,只能有非常刻板的生活。这种生活看上去很美好,工作赚钱(被吹得多么有意义,可惜也都是替人打工,随时可替换), 买房买车, 有个孩子,表面上生活舒适,但一方面生活没有安全感,一方面又没有温情。每个人连美好的都一个样子,没什么缺点,教育高,有几个兴趣爱好,品味也一致(精致的审美),facebook post的照片也一致,孩子教育方法也一致。上班,下班去gym , 去酒吧,聊球赛聊时事,养孩子,占去了所有的时间与精力,也阻止了中产阶级去问一些最基本的生存问题– 我为什么要这么做?

可怜是那些自我意识强的人,意识到了这样生活的呆板,想要更多真诚的情与爱, 只可是这样的社会本来就没有多少感情,再加上感情都只存在于瞬间。他们永远是那么不满足,永远是忧伤。

他们又太弱小,没有能力离开这个社会也没有能力创造自己的空间,只能久久徘徊在这个社会的边缘,想融入这个社会,又对其充满满是抱怨。

这就大概就是文艺青年的烦恼。

 

 

On Woody Allen

I was shocked to see a new film released by Woody Allen, Cafe Society. What? Is he still working?

Yes, he is still putting out films at the age of 80! Even though I haven’t watched his newest film, I love his previous films so much that I just want to talk about him.

0e6196ff8138079891760535e4067b12

Woody Allen

The main character in Allen’s film, often played by himself, is a neurotic, fast-talking, therapy-seeking, New York-centric, Jewish male who has problems with women.The Woody Allen persona is of a physical coward who lusts after women. He is good-hearted but clumsy, ineffectual and nervous – always stuttering and whining through the movie. Allen’s persona perfectly reflects the contradiction and confusion of modern life. The confusion of contemporary people carries while living, while loving and enjoying the material prosperity but suffering from the lost love, fulfillment and emotional distancing, competing  but struggling to remain integrity and innocence in heart.

Over the years, the persona has gradually changed. The Allen persona is now more likely to be in a domestic situation, or divorced with children. The persona has lived a life full of experiences, but still fears death and sexual impotence. He becomes more aggressive but never lost his innocence.

Certainly, if you met such a person in real life you would either be sympathetic to his plight (the maternal instinct) or repulsed by his weakness (the survival of the fittest instinct) but you would not be able to stand his company for more than a couple of hours. The persona mirrors human weaknesses and frailties, and shows us what we are like inside.

Allen’s film are more like novels, even himself has compared his films to novels. There are several reasons for this comparison. First of all, many of his films are about writers and the creative process (a subject novelists often write about). Secondly, Allen usually has one of the characters tell the story – film in the first person. Furthermore, by seeing the narrator’s thoughts, we do not necessarily see events in chronological order, or accurately. For example, both Annie Hall and Stardust Memories are the remembrances of the central character, a discussion inside their heads which we are watching unfold.

Allen puts his eyes on middle class. The middle class often come under attack from the artistic community. Tolstoy said that the middle class keep society functioning, and that is certainly Allen’s point of view. Allen shows families who function despite the problems they may have. They keep themselves busy, fill their lives with as many distractions as possible, so that they do not have to think about the big things in life. Isaac comments on this in Manhattan, as does Steffi in September, and Mickey in Hannah And Her Sisters.

Woody Allen’s films explore critical questions in modern life,  spanning from culture, ideologies, sex, mass media, literature and psychology. They carry on debates between fabulation and realism, between illusion and anti-illusion. While Allen’s dialogic films never leave us with clear solutions to all these problems, Allen’s active experimentation with style and idea heightens our ability to feel and to observe, to know ourselves and our world. Allen’s sad and funny films make us look anew at the fundamental questions of our existence. Those films express our utopia hope and destruct them. They explore the advantages and limitations that come with time, sophistication and self-awareness. They consider our absurd but powerful dreams of an authentic innocence — our longing for satisfaction beyond frustrated desire.

That is why you should watch his films. MY top 3 of his films are

  1. Annie Hall
  2. Interiors
  3. Manhattan

Art compensates the limitation of life.

 

 

 

不谈政治

这次举选之后,我就对自己说了,不要再谈政治了。倒不是因为我害怕,或者因为对结果的失望,仅仅是觉得政治问题是一个极复杂的问题,经济利益,信仰,宗教,教育再加上整个三权分立的政治制度一结合,做为一般民众根本很难认清。而且,空谈对事情本身必无多益。我们也看到了即使这么多媒体如此报道Trump, 还是不影响选民根据自己的标准做出自己适合的选择。

言语极少能真的说服众人,即使这是一些弱势群体最后能使用的武器。对于minority group, LGBT, Muslin 还有 一些辛苦工作的immigrants来说,这次的结果的确令他们失心。但我也只能说,把所有的希望都压在一次选举上并不现实,所有的权利只能自己慢慢的,一步一步的争取。

对于我个人而言,关心政治也是出于兴趣,本身对我的影响并不特别大。 大约在三年前,我决定不再看中国的政治新闻,因为多看多气,即使愤怒也解决不了任何的问题。从今天开始,我决定不再看美国的政治,Republican这么流氓的政党上台,为了自己的身心健康,还是不看为好。

有空的时间不如自己多学习,多赚钱,多玩玩, 正所谓,穷则独善其身。

但是,我作为liberal的信念是不会变的。

 

 

Democracy Under Attack

This election is  truly revolutionary,  forcing a lot of people to rethink about US political system and its fundamental values. Sadly, a thing worth noticing is that people start to doubt about the founding principle in US, democracy.

In all social websites, those who are angry with the results, are attacking the other side who voted for Trump, as not qualified for voting since they are too stupid, vicious, less informed, etc. This is totally anti-democracy.

However, this is not the first time people doubting democracy. The interesting thing is , this time, those who are doubting the system are democrats and liberals.  Before the election, it is Republicans who constantly attack democracy.

Remember Donald Trump’s claim ” The system is rigged”? To his surprise, it actually works for him this time!

20161111_124317.jpg

The Great Suppression: Voting Rights, Corporate Cash, and the Conservative Assault on Democracy“, this book by Zachary Routh, detailed explained all the tactics Republican Party used in last decades to undermine democratic values. They achieve this by restricting voting rules, opening the campaign-money spigot, blocking progressive local laws and consumer protections, engaging in partisan gerrymandering, and stacking the courts with judges to give their repressive program a green light.

Most of what this book states is right and grounded. However, the author missed one point– Democrats are also trying their best to manipulate the system to their benefits They are not innocent as they appear to be.The reason why Republican seems to be worse is simply because they are in control of Congress and House.

Democracy doesn’t mean populism. Populism is usually emerging when the populace is frustrated with their perceived inability to affect legislation and regulate governance. Populist leaders may rouse the people with rhetoric of political rebirth: the return to sovereign rule by the people, which is how they define classic democracy. The emergence of populism, however, can result in populist leaders acquiring more and more power and subverting the very democratic traditions they profess to uphold. Assurances of dismantling elitist politics can then lead to a highly authoritarian and centralized rule.Extreme populism works against any limitations on the manifestation of the public will. The majority must rule with no exception for the rights of individuals or concern for the repression of minority groups. Much populist rhetoric includes xenophobic, nationalistic and exclusionary language. This may be another reason why this election happened.

In the end, I personally have faith in US political system, but still, any manipulation of the system should be warned and punished.

 

 

Reflection after Election — What went wrong, Democratic Party?

The day after yesterday’s election, sure, the sun still arise, I still run for half an hour and  bought my cup of coffee to start my day. It seems the same at the beginning.

However, when I walked across the campus  back home at night, I finally broke down and could not hold my anger any more.  Unlike some people pointing their fingers to Trump supporters and calling them “racists”, “sexists”, “stupid and crazy idiots”, I do not blame those people. Democracy finally guarantees their voice being heard and their choices being recognized. As the opposite side, we should respect their choice and try to understand why they make this choice.

jm102_the-forgotten-man-__79954-1460475181-1280-1280

The working class, labeled as white without college degree in mainstream media,  are finally upset with the government, the establishment, and the mass media who only talk about minority issues and view them as privileged and guilty. They make the choice to throw them all out.

Is Trump the answer to their problem?  I do not think so, however, they know for sure, Clinton is definitely not.

Who to blame?  The Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party has abandoned them and even victimized them constantly in the last decade.  The Democratic Party whose only focus is on getting the votes from the minority and getting the donation from the wealthy and the big corporation, ignored them.

Democratic Party pushed for free trade agreements without providing the millions of blue-collar workers who thereby lost their jobs in this globalization any means of getting new ones. Democratic Party protected Wall Street and big corporations through tax-payer bailouts, but never helped millions of people in financial crisis. Democratic Party who believed in using race card and LGBT,  women issues could cover up their failure in governing.

Finally, the voters reject them and they still try to denial the failure.

If there is anyone who need change and reform, it is the Democratic Party.  Stop obsessing with ideologies and end their financial dependence on big corporationsand the wealthy, they still have a shot in 2016.

After all, a lot of people are still hoping for a more open and supportive society.

 

To All Trump Supporters

After this election,  finally, your voice and messages are heard.The rejection towards globalization, feeling screwed by the establishment, feeling left over from the economic and technology growth push you to an “unconventional ” figure, who confirms you again and again that your problem is caused by the illegal immigrants, the poor on welfare, the Muslim,the Chinese, the Mexican etc and getting them all out will make America Great Again.

I just wonder one thing : Where does  the word “Again” come from? When was the time exactly you think better than now? Is it the time when the white were the rich class and the rest didn’t have either money or power?

Then, you have a long way to go back.

I don’t America is doing poorly, overall, we are progressing and benefiting from the technology improvement and global collaboration.

However,  progress doesn’t come to everyone at the same time, at the same level. In the meantime, progress brings new challenges.  Some of the voters may be among those who have not benefit so much from the progress but feel the all troubles it bring.  I do understand all the pains.

But the solution is not to retreat, glorifying the past and saying no to everything. In the opposite, we should continue our path in social and technology improvement, constituting a more liberal and supportive society and helping everything, especially those left behind catching up.

A man who does not pay tax, can not be viewed to care about the country.

Distrusted Elites– Why one with NO Political Knowledge or Experience is still running?

In the last two days, I “discussed” ( argued) with some Chinese Americans who support Trump. It shocked me at first that so many Chinese are supporting Trump. The Chinese immigrants in US are highly educated and  with high income , not fitting into the racism, misogyny or white identity which media always portrait as the Trump supporters. What are they really thinking?

Of course, choosing a leader involves a lot of trust,belief and faith. Arguing which policy is better obviously beyond  me (also I believe most of people, even scholars may not fully understand the consequence of each policy). Thus, even people claim that Trump is able to Make America Great Again,  they are talking about belief, not reality.

There can be various reasons why people support Trump, corporations, lazy people on welfare, criminals who have learned to play the victim, illegal immigrants, foreign governments, and of course politicians.  Voters don’t like Hilary Clinton, mainly because that she is such a polished politician who knows where to get donation and knows how to lie.

In the opposite, Trump looks like a revolutionary hero. His words are  totally against the traditional political figures in every way. When working-class people feel they’re getting screwed, they look up to a outsider to bring the ” changes ” they want.

Then the question remains, how can a total outsider beat so many professional politicians?

It is due to the distrust for  the elites, those who run white house , the pentagon, the wall street and also the mass media, those who claim to serve the people but only serve their interests. However, let us be fair, not every one in these positions are corrupted, but only a small percentage and a few crisis can totally destroy the trust. According to Gallup, confidence in Congress is at a measly 7 percent.

Even though, throwing all the elites out and bringing a total outsider  is still a truly terrible decision in my mind. 

If Trump loses next Tuesday, the anti-establishment will still go on. The establishment and the elites should learn from this and gradually prove to the people that they still worth the trust.

 

 

The Story of Spice Trade

I used to travel and stay in Zanzibar for a short period of time, and that sweet memory lingers in my mind for  the rest of my life. It also triggered my interest in spices and the whole history of spicy trading (Zanzibar., nicknamed as Spice Island,  used to be an important spot in spicy trading).  The history fascinates , also inspires me.

Map of world made from different kinds of spices, close-up

The world map made  from different kinds of spices

The spice trading is as old as human civilization, dating back to

why are spices highly demanded during ancient time?

Few historians talk about this that it seems to be self evident. However, the reason they all believe in, is still a little bit doubtful for me.  The common explanation goes like this, spices covered the taste of spoiled meat. At that time, refrigeration was not available, and some hot spices have been shown to serve as an anti-bacterial agent. Salting, smoking or drying meat were other means of preservation.

However, I doubt that because spices were much expensive than fresh meat.  As Yale Professor Paul Freedman claims:

The demand for spices may then be said to combine a taste for strongly flavored food, a belief in their medicinal properties, and also the sense of well-being, refinement and health the fragrance was said to confer, similar to the claims made by those practicing aromatherapy in recent years. Once these varied properties were recognized or accepted, spices became objects of conspicuous consumption, a mark of elite status as well as markers of exquisite taste in all senses of the word.

For me, I believe spices, like other luxury, make life much better. The food are vastly enhanced with the right spices and make eating  one of life’s great delights.

Why were spices so expensive?

From economic theory, the price is determined by supply and demand. After realizing the high demand of spices, the short supply of spices, the high cost of transporting are the factors driving up the price. Spice plants were limited in supply. They grew in particular areas and they could not always be moved for cultivation elsewhere. However, the route from east to west, Silk Road, was often closed during various wars and were later controlled and blocked by Muslims due to the conflicts between Christian and Muslim.

Initially, the spice trade was conducted mostly by camel caravans over land routes. The Silk Road was an important route connecting Asia with the Mediterranean world, including North Africa and Europe, linking the great civilizations of China, India, Egypt, Persia, Arabia, and Rome. Spice trade also contributes to the spread of Islam (http://www1.american.edu/ted/spice.htm)

The Age of Exploration inspired by Spices

santamaria

After taking control of the sole spice trade route that existed at the time, the Ottama Empire charged hefty taxes on spice trading. Europeans were desperate to get spices from Asia that they started to look for alternative route from sea to Asia. Portugal was the first European country that sent explorers to search for the sea route to Asia. Prince Henry the Navigator started a school of navigation and financed the first voyages to the west coast of Africa. In the 1400’s, however, sailors were afraid of sea monsters and boiling hot water at the Equator, so progress was slow. After Bartholomew Dias and his crew made it to Africa’s Cape of Good Hope, Vasco da Gama and his crew became the first to sail around Africa and through the Indian Ocean to India.

Spain, however, would soon take over the lead in exploration. When Portugal refused to finance Christopher Columbus’ idea to sail west to find the shortcut to the Indies, he convinced Spain’s King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella to finance it. On October 12, 1492, Christopher Columbus and his crew reached the island of Hispaniola after three months in the Atlantic Ocean. Although Columbus believed he had reached Asia, he had actually discovered the entire continent of North America and claimed it for Spain.

 

The Decline of Spice Trading

Large supply, the change of taste and the invention of refrigerator are all accounting for the decline in spice trading since the eighteenth century. Some believe in the invention of ice cooling as the popular food preservation method.

iceblock

 

Fredric Tudor, known as “Ice King”, was the man who commercialized and popularized ice as a daily life commodity.

220px-frederic_tudor-facingright_pre1864

Tudor was visionary  when he first thought to harvest wintertime ice from New England’s ponds and rivers and export it to the tropical French colony of Martinique where it could be used to cool drinks, preserve food and soothe patients suffering from yellow fever. According to Tudor, his venture “excited the derision of the whole town as a mad project.” Even his father thought it was “wild and ruinous.” The business model of the ice trade was simple supply and demand, but getting the product to market without melting was the challenge. When Tudor couldn’t find any merchant willing to ship water—even if it was frozen—inside his ship, he bought his own brig for $4,750 and set sail in 1806 with 130 tons of ice cut from a pond on the family estate outside Boston. “No joke. A vessel with a cargo of ice has cleared out from this port for Martinique. We hope this will not prove to be a slippery speculation,” mocked the Boston Gazette. Packed in hay, most of the ice survived the three-week voyage, but with no icehouses to store the goods in Martinique, Tudor saw his profits quickly melt away. He lost $4,000 on the voyage.

Undeterred, Tudor shipped 240 tons of ice to Havana the following year but again made no money. The Embargo Act of 1807 and the War of 1812 crippled American shipping and put Tudor’s business on ice. With his losses mounting, Tudor twice ended up in debtor’s prison, but onward he pushed. Learning from his mistakes, he ensured icehouses were built at arrival ports and harvest locations. By constantly experimenting, he discovered that sawdust minimized melting better than hay. The Bostonian gained monopolies in Havana and Jamaica and found domestic success by shipping ice to Charleston, Savannah and New Orleans. Tudor tirelessly touted the merits of his product—even offering bartenders free ice to give customers chilled drinks to get them hooked—but the workload led to anxiety, exhaustion and a bout of depression in 1821.

After he recuperated in Cuba, Tudor’s ice trade took off when he teamed up in 1825 with Nathaniel Wyeth, one of his suppliers, who invented a two-bladed, horse-drawn ice cutter. The device scored an ice sheet into a checkerboard grid of blocks that could easily be pried out with iron bars. Wyeth’s innovation replaced the laborious process of harvesting ice with pickaxes, chisels and saws, and enabled mass production. Plus, the uniform blocks, basically giant ice cubes, could be packed more tightly to minimize melting.

The revolutionary technology was tested when Tudor shipped ice on a 16,000-mile journey from Boston to Calcutta in 1833. Despite spending four months at sea, most of the 180-ton shipment arrived in India intact. The crystal-clear New England ice caused such a sensation in Calcutta that within three days residents commissioned the construction of an icehouse.

Finally, the determined Tudor had proven it was possible to mass-produce a supply of natural ice and successfully deliver it anywhere in the world where there was demand. The ice trade boomed, and Tudor became the industry’s frosty tycoon.

Further read : The Stubborn American Who Brought Ice to the World

After all, the world’s first globalization begun just due to the pursuit of more flavorful food, that is a wonder by itself.